Imagine that Mr. Michels wins the election

Imagine that Mr. Michels wins the election in November, then imagine that someone other than Mr. Trump wins the presidential election. What can Gov. Michels do about it? Ya know he does not believe in our American democracy unless Mr. Trump wins, and even then he will quibble about the results, as Mr. Trump did in 2017. Could he not seat the electors to verify the election of someone other than Mt. Trump? What could we, as ordinary people, do about whatever Gov. Michels does to ensure Mr. Trump is president again? We can not really do too much. If we protest, he will call out the National Guard to put down any crowds, ya know, keeping the public safe from rioters. We could write letters to the editor – big whoop! As far as Gov. Michels is concerned, your concerns are so much sour grapes, and not really worthy of his consideration.

The majority rules only sometimes? Ask Mr. Michels and Sen. Ron Johnson. The election was held in 2020, and the outcome was pretty substantial, but still they question that it was accurate.

Mr. Trump is not elected

Imagine that Mr. Trump is not elected president next time around. How will you react? Will you sit back and say, “Yes!” Will you go an a rampage and insist that he be sworn in anyway, and back that up with rioting, and killing of the president-elect, his family, vice-president-elect,his family, members of Congress that are opposed to Mr. Trump, etc.?

Sen. Johnson is advertising how Mr. Barnes is not a ‘law and order’ guy (though I am not sure how that matters to Senators – what do they have to do with law and order?), but you wait until Mr. Trump is not elected, then law and order will go out the window until Mr. Trump is sworn in as president. Who will he be killing, Sen. Baldwin, Rep. Pocan, Sen. Schumer, or some one else? How will the Republicans decide who will do what killing where? They will have to do something to make sure Mr. Trump is president. I wonder if Sen. Johnson is unhappy that Vice-president Pence was not hung last time so the election of Pres. Biden could not happen? At least VP Pence was being true to his vows as he saw them.

– As all Republicans know, election polling is flawed, so any election is never really an honest and fair election, especially if they lose. But then, again, maybe that is just sour grapes. It is too bad that their Moms are not around to kiss it and make it all better.

Sen. Johnson is a hypocrite

I am not sure why Sen. Johnson is running for his seat in the Senate except that he is a hypocrite. He does not believe in our system of government, after all if he did why would he have helped and tried to submit an alternate slate of electors for this state? Of course he can say the election is flawed, but that, in itself, is the basis for our system of government. If he loses any election in the future, he can claim the same, and there are those who will agree with him, because, of course, if he does not win, it is the system’s fault, not his popularity. Can we have free, fair, and open elections at all, or will all elections be tainted by these problems that only loser (& sometimes winners: reference Pres. Trump 2016) Republicans claim? I have not heard of any Democrats who have made these claims yet, but they believe in our system of government.

Another point of hypocrisy Sen. Johnson has is his statement on Wisconsin attorney Sopen Shah’s nomination for appointment to be U.S. Attorney for the United States District Court in the Western District of Wisconsin. After all there are many who see his support or rejection of the Supreme Court justices recently affirmed as political in nature: the ones who agree with his politics he votes for, the one who does not he votes against. It has turned out, in many people’s view, that the Supreme Court has become an activist court legislating from the bench.

Of course, he, and many who support conservative issues, will deny most of this because of his self interest.

“Alas Babylon” by Pat Frank, © 1959

This is probably the best apocalyptic story to come out of the Cold War. It is so good because Mr. Frank is an excellent writer, but it also gets a lot of help from his knowledge of the subject: he knew what he was talking about.

“Nations are like people. When they grow old and rich and fat they get conservative. They exhaust their energy trying to keep things the way they are – and that’s against nature.” I do not think Mr. Frank was a particularly liberal guy, after all he was friends with James Michner, but this is a statement of practical politics. Mr. Frank also makes some allusions to the racial divide and how unreasonable the prejudice was. Later on towards the end of the story he mentions the only policy that can save the world from a nuclear holocaust is Mutually Assured Destruction, though he probably had no idea that there truly may have been any such policy.

The story centers on Randy. He is a well-to-do lawyer with inherited wealth. He lives in a backwater part of Florida. Randy was a veteran of the Korean Conflict and his brother is a officer in Strategic Air Command, so Randy has a fair amount of knowledge and understanding of what a nuclear war would entail. The cause of the war is simple, but how true to life is that? The rest of the story shows all the ensuing challenges and how they were overcome.

United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack

The United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack is just trying to make Mr. trump look bad. He is really just a normal person like you and I, except he has billions of dollars, cheats on his wives, taxes, golf, etc. It is like they are trying to prove he was trying to cheat the American people of their right to elect a president of their choice. Maybe he was,can you think of a better man to be president? I sure can! But that is me, I am not entranced by this scam artist (another way to describe cheaters 🙂 ).

‘* – A Short History of Nearly Everything” by Bill Bryson, © 2003

I have read this book before but it is long enough that it is pretty much new again. I remember some of the phrases and sentences from way back, but a lot of it was rather unknown and interesting.

It is a general science book that goes all over, though not with any great depth, but enough to give you the feel that folks who study rocks, or stars, do have some reason to think of the age, or distance, as so much, and not just picking a number out of the blue.

picture comparisons – Trump versus Biden

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/president-trump-smiles-gives-thumbs-up-in-photo-with-baby-orphaned-in-el-paso-massacre?fbclid=IwAR2A_auyTx8E6p9HyjVoqfXSrPuxPH9PMFiC9XaRhK4fc2jzgxyo0f2RJW4

are there any similar pictures of Pres. Biden around? I am slightly surprised that there have not been any comparisons done yet. folks hate one or the other for whatever reason, and now here are two very similar incidents that should have some interesting thoughts. joe

tragic how the gunman got into the school

It is tragic how the gunman got into the school and killed all those children and teachers. I am sure Sen. Johnson and other Republicans wish there was a way to address the issue without threatening the income of the weapons manufacturers. This might be considered part of the ‘military/industrial complex.’ They are all in the same racket, so to speak.

I know that there is something being bandied about about the second amendment and ‘compensating,’ I think there is more going on here.

I was going to write about how they are all about decreasing the human population of the world, but that is too cynical and outlandish, even if true. I do think there are too many people in the world, but that is another issue. Their actions speak like that is what they are trying to do, though. In fact, their words are saying one thing, but their actions are saying another. It is hypocritical for them to ‘keep the families and friends of the victims in our thoughts and prayers,’ then do nothing about it. They do not care about the people affected by gun violence, they care about getting reelected, so they do not buck the National Rifle Association. The manufacturers of guns do not care how the product is used, just that they sell more. In an interview in 2017 (Forbes), Marty Daniel pooh-poohed the idea of common sense gun laws, “Terms like ‘common sense’ come from people whose only goal is to take our guns away,…” In other words, we should not be trying to control guns.

Consider that a saw does not care if your finger is there and gets cut, it is doing what it was made to do. Likewise, a company does not care how it’s products are used, just that they are being sold, and the stockholder’s equity (return on investment) is increased, and this is why Mr. Daniel and Republicans do not want restrictive gun laws – it will hurt the bottom line of the gun makers. But this is also why we have humans deciding how things are done, like environmental, or worker safety laws. Because companies are concerned with only the bottom line, not the human cost of any part of what they do, humans regulate the companies so there is some way to make the companies be proper citizens of the community. Otherwise there is no moral or ethical backstop to what companies or the people controlling them will do.

Just another example of companies or the people controlling them ignoring the human cost of doing business.

On the Road” by Jack Kerouac, ©1957

Ne’er-do-well bums out for joy rides.

This book has moments of inspired writing, but the story was pretty lame. Sal meets various guys who want to be writers, like Carlos and Dean. These fellows can not stop philosophizing, but they never get anywhere with all the talk. That is ok though, they are lost souls trying to find meaning the best they can.

Dean is from Denver, comes to New York to learn from Sal how to be a writer. He does not get very far with becoming a writer, but he meets people who encourage him, so he keeps on trying. He has to go back to Denver, so Sal says he will travel across to see him there, and then on to San Francisco, to see other folks. It takes him a couple of tries to get on the way, but he does get there, and parties it up. After a couple of weeks there he heads off to San Fran. He gets a job with his friend there, but he does not like it, and by the end of summer he busing it to Los Angeles, where he meets a woman who takes him back up to Salinas, where he bums around for a while, works some, and decides to head back to New York. And so it goes…

These guys just keep on being drunk and disorderly, having sex wherever, whenever they can. The girls are just there as sex objects, they do not impinge on the antics of the fellows very much. The women are shunted aside whenever they get in the way. They act like juvenile delinquents partying it up, stealing and trashing cars willy-nilly, being drunk and disorderly, ect.

It is to be noted that the word ‘beat’ as they use it is an abbreviation of ‘Beatitude’ or ‘Beatific’ –

Definition of beatitude

  1. 1a :  a state of utmost bliss
  2. b Christianity —used as a title for a primate especially of an Eastern church
  3. 2Christianity :  any of the declarations made in the Sermon on the Mount (Mt 5:3–11) beginning in the Authorized Version “Blessed are

Representative Timothy Ramthun

It occurs to me that I can not see voting for Representative Timothy Ramthun for governor. He does not believe in truth, justice and the American way. I mean if he thinks the majority of the voters should not have their votes counted properly and respected as being the choice they made, that is not the American way. If he thinks this, then he should not be Governor. He could not honestly take the oath of office. As far as that goes Mr. Trump could not/did not honestly take his oath of office, just like he did not take his wedding vows seriously.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started