I am going to blather on here just to get this off my chest. I realize that whatever I write here is so much ado about nothing because it is so lacking in actually making a difference, and it is probably too simplistic.
Two things I have thought of – first is that if Mr. Trump’s insurrection had succeeded, we would not be expecting such high gas prices. He would not be stopping the gas and oil shipments from Russia because he supports Pres. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, at least under the table. I am not sure why he likes Pres. Putin, but it is probably because, like China and North Korea’s leaders, he does not have any end of ruling in sight. But, whatever, he is not enamored with democratic governments, as shown by the insurrection – ya know, let the majority be ruled by the minority because might is stronger than right. I am glad to see that there are people who think our government is doing good and should not be subverted by insurrectionists. Let us see some of our Republican representatives say and act on that.
I have seen that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky won his election by 73% of the vote. That is quite a landslide victory, not the piddling 1 or 2 per cent victories we see around here. No matter what the reason for the invasion, it is to be decried because it is trying to overturn that election win.
Second, is that Pres. Putin has been reported to have put the nuclear arsenal on standby, or ready, or something, so it is usable sooner than otherwise. This is not because he would use those weapons in the Ukraine, but on other governments that support and aid Ukraine. He can not use the weapons in Ukraine because Russian soldiers are there, but he could bomb Bonn or Krakow easily. It is to be noted that this would mean that technicians would have to arm, aim and shoot the missiles, which all could be subverted – do not really arm the missile, aim the missile at the Arctic Sea, refuse to release the arming mechanism so it can not be ignited, all of this could be done without Pres. Putin’s knowledge, so subverting his attack. But how likely is some technician to think of and perform such an act?
I am going to
I am going to blather on here just to get this off my chest. I realize that whatever I write here is so much ado about nothing because it is so lacking in actually making a difference, and it is probably too simplistic.
Two things I have thought of – first is that if Mr. Trump’s insurrection had succeeded, we would not be expecting such high gas prices. He would not be stopping the gas and oil shipments from Russia because he supports Pres. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, at least under the table. I am not sure why he likes Pres. Putin, but it is probably because, like China and North Korea’s leaders, he does not have any end of ruling in sight. But, whatever, he is not enamored with democratic governments, as shown by the insurrection – ya know, let the majority be ruled by the minority because might is stronger than right. I am glad to see that there are people who think our government is doing good and should not be subverted by insurrectionists. Let us see some of our Republican representatives say and act on that.
I have seen that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky won his election by 73% of the vote. That is quite a landslide victory, not the piddling 1 or 2 per cent victories we see around here. No matter what the reason for the invasion, it is to be decried because it is trying to overturn that election win.
Second, is that Pres. Putin has been reported to have put the nuclear arsenal on standby, or ready, or something, so it is usable sooner than otherwise. This is not because he would use those weapons in the Ukraine, but on other governments that support and aid Ukraine. He can not use the weapons in Ukraine because Russian soldiers are there, but he could bomb Bonn or Krakow easily. It is to be noted that this would mean that technicians would have to arm, aim and shoot the missiles, which all could be subverted – do not really arm the missile, aim the missile at the Arctic Sea, refuse to release the arming mechanism so it can not be ignited, all of this could be done without Pres. Putin’s knowledge, so subverting his attack. But how likely is some technician to think of and perform such an act?
just to get this off my chest. I realize that whatever I write here is so much ado about nothing because it is so lacking in actually making a difference, and it is probably too simplistic.
Two things I have thought of – first is that if Mr. Trump’s insurrection had succeeded, we would not be expecting such high gas prices. He would not be stopping the gas and oil shipments from Russia because he supports Pres. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, at least under the table. I am not sure why he likes Pres. Putin, but it is probably because, like China and North Korea’s leaders, he does not have any end of ruling in sight. But, whatever, he is not enamored with democratic governments, as shown by the insurrection – ya know, let the majority be ruled by the minority because might is stronger than right. I am glad to see that there are people who think our government is doing good and should not be subverted by insurrectionists. Let us see some of our Republican representatives say and act on that.
I have seen that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky won his election by 73% of the vote. That is quite a landslide victory, not the piddling 1 or 2 per cent victories we see around here. No matter what the reason for the invasion, it is to be decried because it is trying to overturn that election win.
Second, is that Pres. Putin has been reported to have put the nuclear arsenal on standby, or ready, or something, so it is usable sooner than otherwise. This is not because he would use those weapons in the Ukraine, but on other governments that support and aid Ukraine. He can not use the weapons in Ukraine because Russian soldiers are there, but he could bomb Bonn or Krakow easily. It is to be noted that this would mean that technicians would have to arm, aim and shoot the missiles, which all could be subverted – do not really arm the missile, aim the missile at the Arctic Sea, refuse to release the arming mechanism so it can not be ignited, all of this could be done without Pres. Putin’s knowledge, so subverting his attack. But how likely is some technician to think of and perform such an act?
write in David Brockert to replace Sen. Ron Johnson 