challenge Sen. Johnson

Now that the Democrats are lining up to challenge Sen. Johnson, or whoever, for a Senate seat, I have some suggestions for ads.

The first is to take Sen. Johnson’s ad about how Sen. Feingold supported collecting data relevant to climate change. It showed a few men in lab coats chasing some cows with bottles to collect the flatulence from the cows. It can be noted, and someone can ask one who studies climate change and livestock, that Sen. Johnson does not know how science works. Is this someone we want as our senator, someone who has little if any idea of how science works?

A second is his ad about Sen. Feingold’s support for Obamacare, or whatever name it really has. Two women are chatting over a cup of coffee, and one asks if there is any government program that does not have corruption and fraud in it, so how can this health care system Sen. Feingold supports be any different? A good point, but Sen. Johnson supports building the wall between Mexico and the United States, and he used to think that Mexico was going to pay for it as well (I have a bridge I could sell such a gullible fellow), but the point about healthcare can be made about this wall. Why would he support the one and not the other? It can be considered that the costs to the taxpayer are really not all that different.

A third is the tax cuts and jobs act. I saw an ad of Sen. Johnson’s touting his support because workers will get paid more. Can anyone raise their hand because that actually happened to them? It is to be noted that he used to have a ticker on his webpage that showed the amount of the national debt, but now he has not done that. At one point it was just not counting anymore, now it is not there at all. I wonder why? He once said something about how politicians are not doing anything about the debt, “they just kick the can down the road.” Well, he is following suit, and making it worse by voting for the military spending bill Pres. Biden signed, and then objecting to the Build Back Better bill. Basically one is really important, and the other would just raise the national debt. I think that both are really important, and would raise the national debt, but somehow he figures that the two are not the same.

He also thinks that Mr. Trump won the 2020 election for president, and that the riot on 6 January was not so bad. He also thinks it would have been worse if it was Black Lives Matter rioters. His thoughts about it mimic the thoughts that caused us to have the second amendment to the Constitution. See “The Second – Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America,” Carol Anderson (Author) for reference.

Now that the Democrats are lining up to challenge Sen. Johnson, or whoever, for a Senate seat, I have some suggestions for ads.

The first is to take Sen. Johnson’s ad about how Sen. Feingold supported collecting data relevant to climate change. It showed a few men in lab coats chasing some cows with bottles to collect the flatulence from the cows. It can be noted, and someone can ask one who studies climate change and livestock, that Sen. Johnson does not know how science works. Is this someone we want as our senator, someone who has little if any idea of how science works?

A second is his ad about Sen. Feingold’s support for Obamacare, or whatever name it really has. Two women are chatting over a cup of coffee, and one asks if there is any government program that does not have corruption and fraud in it, so how can this health care system Sen. Feingold supports be any different? A good point, but Sen. Johnson supports building the wall between Mexico and the United States, and he used to think that Mexico was going to pay for it as well (I have a bridge I could sell such a gullible fellow), but the point about healthcare can be made about this wall. Why would he support the one and not the other? It can be considered that the costs to the taxpayer are really not all that different.

A third is the tax cuts and jobs act. I saw an ad of Sen. Johnson’s touting his support because workers will get paid more. Can anyone raise their hand because that actually happened to them? It is to be noted that he used to have a ticker on his official Senate web page that showed the amount of the national debt, but now he has not done that. At one point it was just not counting anymore, now it is not there at all. I wonder why? He once said something about how politicians are not doing anything about the debt, “they just kick the can down the road.” Well, he is following suit, and making it worse by voting for the military spending bill Pres. Biden signed, and then objecting to the Build Back Better bill. Basically he says that one is really important, and the other would just raise the national debt. I think that both are really important, and would raise the national debt, but somehow he figures that the two are not the same.

He also thinks that Mr. Trump won the 2020 election for president, and that the riot on 6 January was not so bad. He also thinks it would have been worse if it was Black Lives Matter rioters. His thoughts about it mimic the thoughts that caused us to have the second amendment to the Constitution. See “The Second – Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America,” Carol Anderson (Author) for reference.

But back to his belief that Pres. Trump won the election in 2020, he says something must have been skewed wit the election system. There must have been some systemic faults that made it so Pres. Trump lost. Is he thinking that our elected city and county clerks are not doing their jobs right? I am sure he does not want to disparage them, but how can it be that Pres. Biden won? It is just not believable!! Yeah, and he can alwo think the sky is green, but the rest of us know better.

Now that the Democrats are lining up to challenge Sen. Johnson, or whoever, for a Senate seat, I have some suggestions for ads.

The first is to take Sen. Johnson’s ad about how Sen. Feingold supported collecting data relevant to climate change. It showed a few men in lab coats chasing some cows with bottles to collect the flatulence from the cows. It can be noted, and someone can ask one who studies climate change and livestock, that Sen. Johnson does not know how science works. Is this someone we want as our senator, someone who has little if any idea of how science works?

A second is his ad about Sen. Feingold’s support for Obamacare, or whatever name it really has. Two women are chatting over a cup of coffee, and one asks if there is any government program that does not have corruption and fraud in it, so how can this health care system Sen. Feingold supports be any different? A good point, but Sen. Johnson supports building the wall between Mexico and the United States, and he used to think that Mexico was going to pay for it as well (I have a bridge I could sell such a gullible fellow), but the point about healthcare can be made about this wall. Why would he support the one and not the other? It can be considered that the costs to the taxpayer for either are really not all that different.

A third is the tax cuts and jobs act. I saw an ad of Sen. Johnson’s touting his support because workers will get paid more. Can anyone raise their hand because that actually happened to them? It is to be noted that he used to have a ticker on his official Senate web page that showed the amount of the national debt, but now he has not done that. At one point it was just not counting anymore, now it is not there at all. I wonder why? He once said something about how politicians are not doing anything about the debt, “they just kick the can down the road.” Well, he is following suit, and making it worse by voting for the military spending bill Pres. Biden signed, and then objecting to the Build Back Better bill. Basically he says that one is really important, and the other would just raise the national debt. I think that both are really important, and both would raise the national debt, but somehow he figures that the two are not the same.

He also thinks that Mr. Trump won the 2020 election for president, and that the riot on 6 January was not so bad. He also thinks it would have been worse if it was Black Lives Matter rioters. His thoughts about it mimic the thoughts that caused us to have the second amendment to the Constitution. See “The Second – Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America,” Carol Anderson (Author) for reference. Yeah, white folks know deep down that they have wronged people of color, and it may come back to haunt them.

But back to his belief that Pres. Trump won the election in 2020, he says something must have been skewed with the election system. There must have been some systemic faults that made it so Pres. Trump lost. Is he thinking that our elected city and county clerks are not doing their jobs right? I am sure he does not want to disparage them, but how can it be that Pres. Biden won? It is just not believable!! Reality is what it is, he can think the sky is green, but the rest of us know better.